Okay, here's a charmingly useless and silly site for those of you who enjoyed I, MONA LISA (aka PAINTING MONA LISA outside the U.S.)
My favorite one? The first one, Mona meets Frank.
Okay, here's a charmingly useless and silly site for those of you who enjoyed I, MONA LISA (aka PAINTING MONA LISA outside the U.S.)
My favorite one? The first one, Mona meets Frank.
I often hear the question: “How much of what you write in your historical novels is actually true?”*
A lot. At the beginning stages of a book, I sit down with all the reliable recorded information that I can find about my hero. I write a timeline of notable events in the woman’s life, then study up on the most important people in her life and how they interacted with her.
Then I meditate on those things, and using those events and people, come up with a dramatic overlay of a plot with a strong theme and gradually-building conflict. It’s usually pretty easy to spot the most crucial moment in my protagonist’s life, and the big pay-off centers around that moment. In most cases, I focus on a particularly dramatic time in my character’s life; right now, with THE BLOODIEST QUEEN, I’m tackling Catherine de’ Medici’s entire earthly existence.
I do Google myself at times to get a feel what readers are saying, and I’ve learned that many of you appreciated the afterword I wrote for THE BORGIA BRIDE. (When I wrote early scenes in that novel, I thought, “Everyone’s going to think that I came up with the unbelievable, gruesome notion that Sancha’s grandfather kept a ‘museum’ of his mummified enemies.” Also, the Borgias’ behavior often strained credibility, so I wanted my readers to know that the more fantastic parts of the novel weren’t just the result of a histrionic imagination.)
Quite honestly, I was late delivering I, MONA LISA and didn’t have time to write an afterword again. So here’s a bit of “insider information,” if you will, about the way I put the story together.